Abstract Neuromuscular transmission in the squid is described in terms of the slow and fast fibers characterizing circular mantle muscle. Various potential transmitter substances and antagonists to synaptic transmission were tested by electrically stimulating giant fibers and recording twitch responses of the circular muscle in the presence of the substances tested. Of these, bath application of L-glutamate had an excitatory effect on circular mantle tissue. Antagonists to L- glutamaté known to mediate synaptic transmission in other neuromuscular systems had no reversible inhibitory effect on transmission. It is concluded that L- glutamate or a glutamate analog may directly excité the slow circular fiber. The apparently inhibiting action of glutamate on fast fibers innervated by the giant axons may arise either presynaptically or postsynaptically. Introduction The functions and properties of the giant axons in squid have been well studied, but little is known about the obliquely striated mantle muscle (Rosenbluth, 1972) innervated by the giant axon. For example, motor ter minals of the giant axon have not been identified anatomically (Bone and Pulsford, 1981), and the identity of neuromuscluar transmitter is unknown. Similarly, little is known about the muscle, e.g. whether the fibers generate action potentials. By applying potential neurotransmitters as well as known blockers to synaptic transmission, the synapses onto the muscle could be more easily understood. Organization of squid mantle muscle has been deter mined by anatomical data and physiological studies have yet to be conducted (Gosline and DeMont, 1985). The mantle is composed primarily of circular muscle tissue. The outer most layers are comprised of slow-twitch fibers whereas the inner fibers are the fast-twitch muscle. The slow muscles are used most often and are characterized by large stores of mitochondria to provide ample amounts of ATP. The fast muscles are only used in escape jetting when they are activated by the giant axons. J. Z. Young (1938) reported that these giant axons act in an "all or none" fashion, but that the muscles do not. One unresloved issue involving these different muscle types concerns the innervation of the muscles themselves. In another invertebrate with obliquely striated muscle, Ascaris, innervation does not occur via peripheral fibers, but through elongated processes that arise from the muscle cells themselves and run to the ventral nerve cords (Rosenbluth, 1972). In the squid, two motor systems exist and the possibility exists of dual innervation of single muscle fibers(Wilson, 1960). The outer zone of the mantle containing the slow muscle is probably not innervated in the same way as the inner zone. The giant axon branches supply the circular muscle of the inner zone and there are probably smaller axons which innervate both the outer and inner circular muscle (Bone and Pulsford, 198 1). Traditionally, fast muscle in vertebrates is thought to generate actions potentials which aid in simultaneous activation of a long muscle fiber over its entire length. However, systems have been described where the fastest fibers in at least one vertebrate, a fish, do not show action potentials. Instead, these muscles rely on the temporal summation of end plate potentials (Gilly and Aladjen, 1987). Action potentials in squid fast muscle have not been observed although Ca action potentials have been observed in many other invertebrates. Nothing is known about the transmitters at either slow or fast fiber neuromuscular junctions in the squid. Glutamate is a good candidate, though based on work on chromatophore muscle (Florey et al, 1985). It has also been shown to be capable of both excitation and inhibition by depolarizing and hyperpolarizing squid neurons. Glutamate may work via a presynaptic action as it din crustacean muscle (Florey and Woodcock, 1968) by causing an increase in miniature potentials which summate to act postsynaptically. Materials and Methods Squid mantles were prepared from Loligo opalescens netted from Monterey Bay. Preparations were obtained by decapitating the animals and making a ventral cut along the length of the mantle. The pen as well as all interior organs were removed and the resulting full mantle preparation was left intact with both stellate ganglia and all the accompanying giant fibers. A second mantle preparation involved manually removing the inner collagen tunic to enable quicker diffusion of bath applied solutions. An excised muscle preparation was also obtained by cutting a strip (20mm X 3mm) of tissue in a direction transverse to the animals long axis (ie., in parallel wtih the circular muscle fibers). A suction electrode with a nalgene tip was attached to a Grass S44 stimulator which was used to directly stimulate giant fibers in full mantle preparations. Twitch responses were measured with a force transducer and recorded on a Gould 220 dual pen chart recorder. Muscle were stimulated using C-shaped Pt/Pt black foil electrodes (3XSmm) mounted 1.5 cm apart and a few mm from the muscle. A force transducer made from Pixie Se miconductor elements (Gilly and Schuer, 1984) was used to measure twitch responses. Stimulations were nor mally given once every 20 seconds with 70 V 3 msec pulses. A polyethylene contact electrode (diameter 2.5 mm) with silver/silver chloride wire was also used to record electrical activity and infor mation was conveyed via a Nicolet 3091 oscilloscope. Potential neurotransmitters used were L- glutamate, acetylcholine, betaine, taurine, isotheonic acid, and octopamine all in 2mM concentrations. Antagonistic che micals in concentrations ranging from 2-20mM include glutamate diethyl ester, glutamate A methyl ester, and 2 amino 4 phosphoro butyric acid. Also used were TTX (20-200 nM), Na-free sea water (450 mM N-methyl glucamine-Cl. 60mM Cacl,, 10 mM KCI, 10 mM HEPES), low Ca seawater, and 10 mM Co seawater. Preparations and solutions were all kept at 9-11° C and muscle tissure was manually washed by pippetting solutions into and out of the glass preparation dish with the tissue pinned down to a piece of Sylgard. Individual muscle cells were obtained by soaking tissue in 1mg/ml sterilized seawater solution of Type 1 A Collagenase (obtained from Sigma) for 1- 3 hours. Tissue was then centrifuged for 5 minutes and the collagenase was replaced by an L-15 (Gibco) based culture medium containing 62 fetal bovine serum medium (Hyclone) and extra salts to achieve final concentrations 10 mM CaCl,, 10 mM KCl, 50 mM MgCL,, and 434.2 mM Nacl in distilled water. The tissue was then vortexed for 3 minutes and centrifuged for one more minute then plated on 12 poly-L-lysine coated coverslips. Voltage clamp experiments were done as described by Brismar and Gilly (1987). Glutamate was also applied directly to isolated cells in sterile seawater via a micropippette and a pressure injection apparatus. Results Full mantle preparations, even with the inner collagen tunic remoyed, proved to be far less effective than isolated muscle strips in washing chemicals in and out quickly. Therefore, the majority of experiments were carried out using isolated pieces of lateral mantle tissue containing both slow and fast twitch fibers. Figure lA shows the electrical activity recorded through a seawater filled polyethylene tube pressed up against the muscle in a full mantle preparation. Such activity is followed by muscle twitch as shown in figure IB. Figure 2A shows a portion of this electrical activity at a faster sweep speed. An initial small, fast action potential is visible and is followed by a larger and much slower response. Following stimualation for several seconds at 20 Hz. the larger response is greatly reduced in amplitude (Figure 3B), while the earlier action potential is unaffected. Presumably the small spike reflects activity in small branches of axons which send identical signals to the neuromuscular junction even after repetitive stimulation. The origin of the slower response is not so clear but it may reflect electrical activities of muscle cells, because this activity précèdes force development. The electrical activity at the muscle obviously changes although the axon spike remains unchanged. Another type of fatigue is seen in measuring muscle twitches. Figure 3A shows how the contractile responses also decline after repetitve stimulation at à much lower frequency (0.05 Hz). Following 20 min of such stimulation, twitch amplitude fell to one-fifth its original value and a second, slow phase of the twitch becomes obvious. Such slow muscle responses were only observed in isolated muscle strip preparations. These responses are most visible following fatigue of the fast component, but in reality the slow twitch is probably always present. In order to conclude that test solutions were diffusing through the muscle tissue, various known antagonists to axon propagation and synaptic transmission were applied. Blockers were considered effective if muscle twitches declined until the antagonist was removed and then then gradually increased back towards the original level. Tetrodotoxin prevents action potential transmission along axons by blocking Na channels. Even in low concentrations, TTX effectively blocked transmission in muscle strip preparations (figure 4). Sodium-free artificial seawater (ASW) acts similarly to TTX by re moying extracellular sodium and preventing action potentials. Solutions can thus gain access to axonal elements in muscle strip preparations. Solutions were also applied which were designed to disrupt neuromuscular transmission. Cobalt ions also block twitches. presumably by inhibiting the amount of Ca influx at the presynaptic motor ter minal and thereby decreasing neurotransmitter release (figure 5). Figure 6 shows how low Ca seawater acts similarly by reducing the amount of extracellur Ca and thereby effecting the amount of neurotransmitter released (Llinas, 1982). Mantle strips were then exposed to bath application of various potential excitatory solutions. Acetylcholine proved ineffective as did betaine, taurine, isotheonic acid. and octopamine. These amino acids known to exist in the axoplasm of axons (Prosser, 1972). Only L-glutamate gave an excitatory response characterized by a gradual contraction extending for about I minute and gradually decreasing to a near-baseline level. The response appears more similar to slow muscle contraction as glutamate does not give rapid twitch-like responses assosciated with fast muscle. Instead, it acts antagonistically to inhibit the fast responses which decrease following glutamate application and increase again upon washing out with seawater (figure 7). The excitatory effect of glutamate does not appear to be due to activation of axons as shown in figure 8. TTX was first applied to block the axons innervating the muscle, but the glutamate response is unaffected. Glutamate blockers were also applied which act antagonistically to glutamate receptors in other systems (Florey et al, 1985). Figure 9 shows typical results of three such blockers on an isolated muscle strip None of the antagonists exhibited convincing reversal. When a glutamate solution was applied in the presence of antagonist, the muscle still exhibited contraction though at a lessened amplitude. It was therefore concluded that glutamate was probably not the transmitter involved at the neuromuscular junction of the fast muscle since the blockers did prevent synaptic transmission. Discussion It appears that glutamate acts to excite certain muscle in the squid and may possibly act to inhibit others. In similar experiments where glutamate was hypothesized as a neurotransmitter on fast and slow muscle in molluscs, it affected fast muscle by causing a series of rapid contractions (Bone and Howarth. 1980, Florey et al. 1985). Slow muscle responded by a slow and elongated contraction as observed in this investigation. Similarly, TTX effectively blocked nerve propagation, but failed to block a response to direct application of glutamate (see figure 6). However, this alone is not enough to conclude that glutamate acts postsynaptically as Florey and Woodcock (1968) discovered in their work with crab muscle. Although L-glutamate has been found to be generally excitatory, there is also evidence for it acting as a blocker to transmission at the giant synapse of the squid stellate ganglion (Kelly and Gage, 1969) and as an inhibitory transmitter on cell bodies of stellate ganglion neurons (Bevan et al, 1975). The three glutamate antagonists all proved ineffective at being able to reversibly block neuromuscular transmission although they were shown to be effective blockers to glutamate in squid chromatophore muscles (Florey et al, 1985). While the glutamate itself was excitatory on at least the slow muscle, the blockers presumably did not diminish twitch activity because the slow muscle was not being stimulated significantly with single shocks. The giant axons are thought to run only into the central circular muscle where the fast muscle fibers are found. Therefore, if only fast muscle is being stimulated, the blockers would have no effect if the glutamate were only affecting the slow muscle. This is consistent with the data that shows that the blockers were largely ineffective at blocking neuromuscular transmission. Although only a few of the criteria for establishing the identity of a neurotransmitter have been met (Dorsett 1975), the evidence suggests References Bevan S.J., Katz B., and Miledi R. 1975. Membrane potential fluctuations produced by glutamate in nerve cells of the squid. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 191. 561-565. Bone Q., and Howarth, J. V. 1980. The role of L- glutamate in neuromuscular transmission in some molluscs. I mar. biol. Ass. UK. 60. 619-626. Bone Q., Pulsford A., and Chubb A.D. 1981. Squid mantle muscle. I mar biol. Ass. UK. 61.327-342. Brismar, T., and Gilly, W. 1987 Synthesis of sodium channels in the cell bodies of squid giant axons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 84. 1459-1463. Dorsett, D. A. 1975. Some apects of neural organization in molluscs. Simple Nervous Systems Crane, Russak, and Co. Florey, E., Dubas, F., and Hanlon, R.T. 1985. Evidence for L-Glutamate as a transmitter substance of motoneurons innervating squid chromatophore muscles. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 820. 259-268. Florey, E. and Woodcock, B. 1968. Presynaptic excitatory action of Glutamate applied to crab nerve-muscle preparations. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 26. 631-661. Gilly, W. and Aladjem, E. 1987. Physiological properties of three muscle fibre types controlling dorsal fin movements in a flatfish, Ctharichthys sordidus. Jor. Mus. Res. Cell Mot. Vol 8 (in press). Gosline J. and Demont, E. 1985. Jet-propelled swimming in squids. Sci Am. 253.96-104. Llinas, R. 1982. Calcium in synaptic transmission. Sci Am. 247. 56-65. Kelly, J. and Gage, P. 1969. L-glutamate blockade of transmission at the giant synapse of the squid stellate ganglion. Jor. Neurobio. 2. 209-219. Prosser, C. 1973. Comparative Animal Physiology. 3rd Edn. 79-110. Rosenbluth, J. 1972. Obliquely striated muscle. The Structure and Function of the Cell. Vol 1. 2nd Edn. 389-420. Scheuer, T. and Gilly, W. 1986. Charge movement and depolarization-contraction coupling in arthropod vs. skeletal muscle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 83. 8799-8803. Wilson, D. Nervous control of movement in cephalopods. I exp. Biol. 37. 57-72. Young. J. Z. The functioning of the giant nerve fibres of the squid./ exp Biol. 15. 1938. Figure Legend Figure 1: Electrical and contractile recordings from full mantle preparation. A shows electrical activity recor ded from contact electrode in muscle and B shows fast muscle contraction following electrical activity. Figure 2: Electrical activity from stimulation of full mantle preparation. A and B show electrical muscle response before and after repeated stimulation. Figure 3: Fast and slow contractile responses. A demonstrates a fast contraction at high speed and B shows the slow fiber activation after fast muscle fatique. Figure 4: Effect of 20 nM TTX on twitch response ofmuscle strip preparation. Inactivation of axons is demonstrated by decreased response then reversal with washing. Downward arrow represents washing in of TIX and upward arrow represents washing out. Figure 5: Effects of 10mM Co/ Na free (50 mM Ca) on twitch response. Same muscle strip preparation shows inactivation of axon in case of Na and presynaptic terminal in the case of Co. Upward and downward arrows represent washing in and out of antagonists. Figure 6: Effect of low Ca on twitch response. Experiment on full mantle preparation shows effect of blocking neurotransmitter release at presynaptic ter minal. Upward arrow represents washing in and downward arrow represents washing out. Figure 7: Application of L-glutamate and corresponding response. Glutamate gives slow contraction but inhibits fast responses which increase as glutamate is washed out of preparation. Figure 8: Application of L-glutamate in presence of TTX. Even with axons inactivated by TTX, glutamate response is still significant. Figure 9: Twitch responses to glutamate antagonists. None of the three antagonists tested reversibly blocked stimulation. Downward arrows represent washing in and upward arrows represent washing out of antagonists. Figure 10. Model for hypothesized transmission. Glutamate appears to inhibit fast response but act excitatory to slow response. 9 FIGURE 2 200 mg 40 mg B Fast Fast Slow tt min .75 SEC FICURE 3 4 E + 9 kaaata- ktatatatatatata- C O 10 — O 98 9 22 a —* —) ktatataa- ——— — - — — - — O atatatatatakatata- I 0) — — — 5 — — Figure 8 TIX Hlt WASH GLUT min EE + O D a a O - 0 L 8 8 +4 — Acknowledgments I would like to express my gratitude to everyone involved in the 175H program. Thanks go to Carol Marzuola for finding whatever I needed when nobody else knew where to look and to Bruce Hopkins for spending long and lonely nights at the Wharf to keep us supplyed with squid. I also appreciated the enthusiasm and constructive criticisms of Stuart Thompson, the help from Chuck Baxter in locating several applicabse articles, and the equipment loaned to me by Mark Denny. am particularly indebted to my adviser W. F. Gilly. His honesty and criticisms were an invaluable asset in completing this project but it was his guidance and seemingly endless hours of attention which I value the most.